EJNMMI Research · 2019 · 29 citations · 12 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineOncologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyMetastasisPositron Emission TomographyProstate CancerProstate Cancer ImagingProstate-specific Antigen TestingTherapy Response AssessmentTumor CharacterizationBiochemical Response AssessmentImaging Response CriteriaImaging Response EvaluationProgressive Disease AssessmentProstate Cancer MonitoringProstate-specific Membrane Antigen PetProstate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission TomographyPsma-pet Imaging
BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to assess whether and to what extent monitoring response to treatment using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron-emitting tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) studies contribute clinically relevant data to routine clinical follow-up during treatment of patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). RESULTS: Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measurements before and during treatment were investigated. Response was categorized by serum PSA dynamics according to improvement, stable disease, and disease progression and compared to change in imaging findings on pre- and post-treatment PET/CTs. McNemar's test was used to assess agreement between PET/CT- and PSA-based responses to treatment. Thirty-four patients (65.4%) had compatible biochemical- and imaging-based response to treatment. However, the imaging and biochemical responses were discrepant in 18/52 patients (34.6%). PET/CT showed progressive disease in 5/52 patients (9.6%) and improvement/stable disease in 13/52 (25%) compared to biochemical assessment results. Discrepancy between imaging and biochemical response was most prominent in biochemically stable patients (90.9%), followed by patients with biochemical progression (33.3%), and in only few (8.7%) patients with biochemical improvement. The imaging-based response was suitable for choosing subsequent treatment in 22 of 30 patients (73.3%) with longer follow-up (median time of 10.3 months (IQR 6.3-18.2)). The relevance of the imaging methodology was reflected by its ability to assess individual lesions in cases of heterogeneous lesion responses, reveal the appearance of new lesions, and identify lesions that required specific consideration, such as targeted radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is suitable for decision-making in patient management and choice of treatment in the majority of patients.
12
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Ali Afshar‐Oromieh, Tim Holland‐Letz, Frederik L. Giesel et al. · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · 2017 · 515 citations · Full text
Sebastian Schmuck, Christoph A. von Klot, Christoph Henkenberens et al. · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2017 · 157 citations · Full text
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17
Anna Katharina Seitz, Isabel Rauscher, Bernhard Haller et al. · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · 2017 · 140 citations
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17