The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · 2019 · 97 citations · 18 references
HumanitiesPhilosophyNature Of SciencePhilosophy Of ScienceResearch EthicsPublic TrustPublic Understanding Of ScienceScientific ConsensusScientific EvidenceValues In ScienceNon-epistemic ValuesPublic Trust In ScientistsValue-laden Science
There is a growing consensus among philosophers of science that core parts of the scientific process involve non-epistemic values. This undermines the traditional foundation for public trust in science. In this article I consider two proposals for justifying public trust in value-laden science. According to the first, scientists can promote trust by being transparent about their value choices. On the second, trust requires that the values of a scientist align with the values of an individual member of the public. I argue that neither of these proposals work and suggest an alternative that does better. When scientists must appeal to values in the course of their research, they should appeal to democratic values: the values of the public or its representatives.
18
GBD 2010: design, definitions, and metrics
Christopher J L Murray, Majid Ezzati, Abraham D Flaxman et al. · The Lancet · 2012 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere
Gordon Gauchat · American Sociological Review · 2012 · 1.1K citations
Torsten Wilholt · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · 2012 · 257 citations · Full text
Humanities, Philosophy, Epistemology +15