The CFL fails before the ATFL immediately after combined ligament repair in a biomechanical cadaveric model

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact on ankle stability after repairing the ATFL alone compared to repairing both the ATFL and CFL in a biomechanical cadaver model. METHODS: Ten matched pairs of intact, fresh frozen human cadaver ankles (normal) were mounted to a test machine in 20.0° plantar flexion and 15.0° of internal rotation. Each ankle was loaded to body weight and then tested from 0.0° to 20.0° of inversion. The data recorded were torque at 20.0° and stiffness, peak pressure and contact area in the ankle joint using a Tekscan sensor, rotation of the talus and calcaneus, and translation of the calcaneus using a three-dimensional motion capture system. Ankles then underwent sectioning of the ATFL and CFL (injured), retested, then randomly assigned to ATFL-only Broström repair or combined ATFL and CFL repair. Testing was repeated after repair then loaded in inversion to failure (LTF). RESULTS: The stiffness of the ankle was not significantly increased compared to the injured condition by repairing the ATFL only (n.s.) or the ATFL/CFL (n.s.). The calcaneus had significantly more rotation than the injured condition in the ATFL-only repair (p = 0.037) but not in the ATFL/CFL repair (n.s.). The ATFL failed at 40.3% higher torque than the CFL, at 17.4 ± 7.0 N m and 12.4 ± 4.1 N m, respectively, and 62.0% more rotation, at 43.9 ± 5.6° and 27.1 ± 6.8°, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a greater increase in stiffness following combined ATFL/CFL repair compared to ATFL-only repair, although this did not reach statistical significance. The CFL fails before the ATFL, potentially indicating its vulnerability immediately following repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control therapeutic study.