Nature Communications · 2019 · 381 citations · 35 references
EngineeringEnvironmental PolicyEnergy EconomicsEnergy PolicyEnergy SystemsDecarbonization PathwaysEnergy StorageEnergy Storage IntegrationRenewable EnergyDecarbonization ScenariosDeep Decarbonization PathwaysElectric Power Sector DecarbonizationEnergy DecarbonizationEnergy Storage TechnologiesRenewable Energy CurtailmentRenewable IntegrationVariable Renewable Energy
Deep decarbonization of electricity production is a societal challenge that can be achieved with high penetrations of variable renewable energy. The study investigates the potential of energy storage technologies to reduce renewable curtailment and CO₂ emissions in California and Texas under varying emissions taxes. The authors model the impact of energy storage on renewable curtailment and CO₂ emissions in California and Texas under different emissions tax scenarios. Adding 60 GW of renewables to California without storage yields 72 % CO₂ reductions and ~33 % curtailment, but storage raises reductions to 90 % with only 9 % curtailment; in Texas the same deployment gives 54 % reductions with ~3 % curtailment, and storage boosts this to 57 % with 0.3 % curtailment, while generator flexibility further lowers curtailment and storage requirements.
Abstract Deep decarbonization of electricity production is a societal challenge that can be achieved with high penetrations of variable renewable energy. We investigate the potential of energy storage technologies to reduce renewable curtailment and CO 2 emissions in California and Texas under varying emissions taxes. We show that without energy storage, adding 60 GW of renewables to California achieves 72% CO 2 reductions (relative to a zero-renewables case) with close to one third of renewables being curtailed. Some energy storage technologies, on the other hand, allow 90% CO 2 reductions from the same renewable penetrations with as little as 9% renewable curtailment. In Texas, the same renewable-deployment level leads to 54% emissions reductions with close to 3% renewable curtailment. Energy storage can allow 57% emissions reductions with as little as 0.3% renewable curtailment. We also find that generator flexibility can reduce curtailment and the amount of energy storage that is needed for renewable integration.
35
The future cost of electrical energy storage based on experience rates
Oliver Schmidt, Adam Hawkes, Ajay Gambhir et al. · Nature Energy · 2017 · 1.1K citations
Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Industrial Engineering +15