Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2019 · 15 citations · 20 references
ComputingHealth InformaticsInformation SystemsClinical Decision SupportClinical Information SystemsDecision Support SystemsClinical Decision Support SystemsClinical DocumentationDecision SupportSystem ImplementationWorkflow IntegrationWorkflow-integrated Decision SupportBarriersClinical Decision Support System ImplementationClinical Workflow DesignIterative DesignIterative Design DevelopmentIterative Design ProcessPatient Needs AssessmentWorkflow Barriers
OBJECTIVES: We developed and piloted a process for sharing guideline-based clinical decision support (CDS) across institutions, using health screening of newly arrived refugees as a case example. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed CDS to support care of newly arrived refugees through a systematic process including a needs assessment, a 2-phase cognitive task analysis, structured preimplementation testing, local implementation, and staged dissemination. We sought consensus from prospective users on CDS scope, applicable content, basic supported workflows, and final structure. We documented processes and developed sharable artifacts from each phase of development. We publically shared CDS artifacts through online dissemination platforms. We collected feedback and implementation data from implementation sites. RESULTS: Responses from 19 organizations demonstrated a need for improved CDS for newly arrived refugee patients. A guided multicenter workflow analysis identified 2 main workflows used by organizations that would need to be supported by shared CDS. We developed CDS through an iterative design process, which was successfully disseminated to other sites using online dissemination repositories. Implementation sites had a small-to-modest analyst time commitment but reported a good match between CDS and workflow. CONCLUSION: Sharing of CDS requires overcoming technical and workflow barriers. We used a guided multicenter workflow analysis and online dissemination repositories to create flexible CDS that has been adapted at 3 sites. Organizations looking to develop sharable CDS should consider evaluating the workflows of multiple institutions and collecting feedback on scope, design, and content in order to make a more generalizable product.
20
Paul A. Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert J. Thielke et al. · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · 2008 · 51.7K citations · Full text
SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records
Joshua C. Mandel, David Kreda, Kenneth D. Mandl et al. · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2016 · 800 citations · Full text
Computing, Health Informatics, Health Information Management +17
Task analysis for human-computer interaction
Applied Ergonomics · 1990 · 305 citations
A. W. Forrey, Clement J. McDonald, Georges DeMoor et al. · Clinical Chemistry · 1996 · 277 citations · Full text