Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2009 · 40 citations · 9 references
EngineeringPotential TheoryRamanujan ’Analytic Number TheoryExplicit Upper BoundsExplicit Upper BoundVariational InequalityStatisticsLower BoundsVariational InequalitiesConstructive Approximation
We find an explicit upper bound for general <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper L"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">L</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-functions on the critical line, assuming the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, and give as illustrative examples its application to some families of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper L"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">L</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-functions and Dedekind zeta functions. Further, this upper bound is used to obtain lower bounds beyond which all eligible integers are represented by Ramanujan’s ternary form and Kaplansky’s ternary forms. This improves on previous work by Ono and Soundararajan on Ramanujan’s form and by Reinke on Kaplansky’s forms with a substantially easier proof.
9
J. H. van Lint · 2020 · 4.4K citations
Mathematics Education, Education, Foundation Of Mathematics +2
Moments of the Riemann zeta function
K. Soundararajan · Annals of Mathematics · 2009 · 221 citations · Full text