Reducing Cascading Failure Risk by Increasing Infrastructure Network Interdependence

Mert Korkali, Jason G. Veneman, Brian F. Tivnan, James P. Bagrow, Paul Hines

Scientific Reports · 2017 · 175 citations · 59 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Increased interconnection between critical infrastructure networks such as electric power and communications has implications for reliability, yet prior models suggest coupling can raise vulnerability while neglecting real‑system dynamics and control functions. The study compares the robustness of simple topological network models with more realistic cascading dynamics in coupled power‑communication infrastructures. The authors compare a topological contagion model and a percolation model of internetwork cascading to a power‑grid model and three interdependent power‑communication system models. The detailed models reveal that, unlike simple topological models, increased power‑communication coupling generally reduces vulnerability, indicating that interconnecting complementary networks can enhance robustness when failure propagation modes are constrained.

Abstract

Abstract Increased interconnection between critical infrastructure networks, such as electric power and communications systems, has important implications for infrastructure reliability and security. Others have shown that increased coupling between networks that are vulnerable to internetwork cascading failures can increase vulnerability. However, the mechanisms of cascading in these models differ from those in real systems and such models disregard new functions enabled by coupling, such as intelligent control during a cascade. This paper compares the robustness of simple topological network models to models that more accurately reflect the dynamics of cascading in a particular case of coupled infrastructures. First, we compare a topological contagion model to a power grid model. Second, we compare a percolation model of internetwork cascading to three models of interdependent power-communication systems. In both comparisons, the more detailed models suggest substantially different conclusions, relative to the simpler topological models. In all but the most extreme case, our model of a “smart” power network coupled to a communication system suggests that increased power-communication coupling decreases vulnerability, in contrast to the percolation model. Together, these results suggest that robustness can be enhanced by interconnecting networks with complementary capabilities if modes of internetwork failure propagation are constrained.

References

59