Physical Review Research · 2020 · 27 citations · 39 references
This paper shows that soft and hard spheres exhibit qualitatively and quantitatively different behavior under shear. These differences occur because the network of contacts in hard spheres changes precisely when the system traverses a saddle point, while contact changes are much more frequent in soft spheres. Moreover, the scaling relations associated with nonlinear saddle points in soft spheres are similar to scaling relations found previously for the linear response of soft spheres.
39
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Jos W. Richards · Science · 1915 · 14.2K citations
Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices
Max Born, Kun Huang, M. Lax · American Journal of Physics · 1955 · 10.5K citations
Structural Relaxation Made Simple
Erik Bitzek, Pekka Koskinen, Franz Gähler et al. · Physical Review Letters · 2006 · 1.7K citations
Jamming at zero temperature and zero applied stress: The epitome of disorder
Corey S. O’Hern, Leonardo E. Silbert, Andrea J. Liu et al. · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · 2003 · 1.6K citations · Full text
Engineering, Jamming Threshold, Mathematical Statistical Physic +16