International Journal of Intelligent Information Processing · 2012 · 21 citations · 9 references
ComputingLinguisticsMachine LearningPhoneticsStatistical LearningAcoustic PhoneticsKernel MethodsPattern RecognitionSpeech RecognitionSupport Vector MachinesVowel ClassificationCepstral CoefficientsMixture Of ClassifiersNaive BayesNaive Bayes ClassificationSpeech Sound ClassificationSupervised Classification AlgorithmsVowel FeaturesVowel Recognition
In this article, we conduct a study on the performance of some supervised learning algorithms for vowel recognition. This study aims to compare the accuracy of each algorithm. Thus, we present an empirical comparison between five supervised learning classifiers and two combined classifiers: SVM, KNN, Naive Bayes, Quadratic Bayes Normal (QDC) and Nearst Mean. Those algorithms were tested for vowel recognition using TIMIT Corpus and Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs).
9
Chih-Chung Chang, Chih‐Jen Lin · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · 2011 · 41.3K citations
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 33K citations · Full text
A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers
Bernhard E. Boser, Isabelle Guyon, Vladimir Vapnik · 1992 · 11.6K citations
Top 10 algorithms in data mining
Xindong Wu, Vipin Kumar, J. R. Quinlan et al. · Knowledge and Information Systems · 2007 · 5.7K citations