The B → πK puzzle revisited

Nicolas Boisvert Beaudry, Alakabha Datta, David London, Ahmed Rashed, Jean-Samuel Roux

Journal of High Energy Physics · 2018 · 32 citations · 49 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

For a number of years, there has been a certain inconsistency among the measurements of the branching ratios and CP asymmetries of the four B → πK decays (B+ → π+K0, B+ → π0K+, B 0 → π−K+, B 0 → π0K0). In this paper, we re-examine this B → πK puzzle. We find that the key unknown parameter is |C′/T ′|, the ratio of color-suppressed and color-allowed tree amplitudes. If this ratio is large, |C′/T ′| = 0.5, the SM can explain the data. But if it is small, |C′/T ′| = 0.2, the SM cannot explain the B → πK puzzle —new physics (NP) is needed. The two types of NP that can contribute to B → πK at tree level are Z′ bosons and diquarks. Z′ models can explain the puzzle if the Z′ couples to right-handed uū and/or $$ d\overline{d} $$ , with g ≠ g . Interestingly, half of the many Z′ models proposed to explain the present anomalies in b → sμ+μ− decays have the required Z′ couplings to uū and/or $$ d\overline{d} $$ . Such models could potentially explain both the b → sμ+μ− anomalies and the B → πK puzzle. The addition of a color sextet diquark that couples to ud can also explain the puzzle.

References

49