Veterinary Microbiology · 2019 · 25 citations · 24 references
Veterinary MedicineVeterinary EpidemiologyVeterinary MicrobiologyAntimicrobial ResistanceAntimicrobial Resistance EpidemiologyRuminant MedicineAntibiotic ResistanceAntimicrobial DosingAntimicrobial Susceptibility TestingLivestock Infectious DiseasesVeterinary Antimicrobial ResistanceVeterinary Antimicrobial TherapyAntimicrobial Resistance PatternsAntimicrobial Susceptibility Testing CorrelatesAntimicrobial Use In CalvesAntimicrobial Use In CattleInfection Risk FactorsLivestock Antibiotic UseLivestock-associated Antimicrobial ResistanceMannheimia Haemolytica Infection
), separately for group and individual treatments, and for antimicrobial classes. In multivariable mixed logistic regression analyses, risk factors could be identified for reduced susceptibility to certain antimicrobial classes. Group treatment was generally associated with higher rates of not susceptible (NS) M. haemolytica and P. multocida and non-wildtype (non-WT) E. coli. Individual treatment was associated with less NS and non-WT isolates. Age and entry protocol were important confounders with younger animals showing higher rates of NS and non-WT strains. The present findings suggest that, under field conditions, targeted individual treatment of calves can reduce the development of antimicrobial resistance compared to oral group treatment. For the different microorganisms, risk factors for resistance were partially different. This demonstrates that indicator organisms like E. coli do not necessarily reflect the associations observed in respiratory pathogens.
24
Ilias Chantziaras, Filip Boyen, Bénédicte Callens et al. · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2013 · 619 citations
Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Epidemiology, Veterinary Microbiology +17
Michael T. Sweeney, Brian V. Lubbers, Štefan Schwarz et al. · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2018 · 316 citations · Full text