International Journal of Information Technology Modeling and Computing · 2013 · 11 citations · 19 references
EngineeringComputational EngineeringPetroleum EngineeringHeavy Oil RecoveryOptimizationReservoir EngineeringCyclic Steam StimulationReservoir ManagementReservoir Simulation For Heavy OilReservoir StimulationReservoir System OptimizationSteam InjectionConvergenceCyclic Steam Stimulation SimulationCyclic StimulationParticle Swarm OptimizationReservoir Stimulation OptimizationSteam Injection CyclesSteam Injection OptimizationSteam Injection Rate Optimization
Three different variations of PSO algorithms, i.e. Canonical, Gaussian Bare-bone and Lvy Bare-bone PSO, are tested to optimize the ultimate oil recovery of a large heavy oil reservoir. The performance of these algorithms was compared in terms of convergence behaviour and the final optimization results. It is found that, in general, all three types of PSO methods are able to improve the objective function. The best objective function is found by using the Canonical PSO, while the other two methods give similar results. The Gaussian Bare-bone PSO may picks positions that are far away from the optimal solution. The Lvy Bare-bone PSO has similar convergence behaviour as the Canonical PSO. For the specific optimization problem investigated in this study, it is found that the temperature of the injection steam, CO 2 composition in the injection gas, and the gas injection rates have bigger impact on the objective function, while steam injection rate and the liquid production rate have less impact on the objective function.
19