Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classification

Liang Yao, Chengsheng Mao, Yuan Luo

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2019 · 2K citations · 48 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Text classification is a key NLP problem traditionally addressed with convolutional neural networks on regular grids, yet few studies have applied graph convolutional networks to this task. The study proposes using graph convolutional networks for text classification. The authors build a corpus‑wide text graph from word co‑occurrence and document‑word relations, then train a Text GCN that jointly learns word and document embeddings from one‑hot inputs supervised by document labels. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that a vanilla Text GCN outperforms state‑of‑the‑art methods, learns useful word and document embeddings, and its advantage grows when training data is scarce.

Abstract

Text classification is an important and classical problem in natural language processing. There have been a number of studies that applied convolutional neural networks (convolution on regular grid, e.g., sequence) to classification. However, only a limited number of studies have explored the more flexible graph convolutional neural networks (convolution on non-grid, e.g., arbitrary graph) for the task. In this work, we propose to use graph convolutional networks for text classification. We build a single text graph for a corpus based on word co-occurrence and document word relations, then learn a Text Graph Convolutional Network (Text GCN) for the corpus. Our Text GCN is initialized with one-hot representation for word and document, it then jointly learns the embeddings for both words and documents, as supervised by the known class labels for documents. Our experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that a vanilla Text GCN without any external word embeddings or knowledge outperforms state-of-the-art methods for text classification. On the other hand, Text GCN also learns predictive word and document embeddings. In addition, experimental results show that the improvement of Text GCN over state-of-the-art comparison methods become more prominent as we lower the percentage of training data, suggesting the robustness of Text GCN to less training data in text classification.

References

48