Scientific Reports · 2016 · 316 citations · 54 references
Social SciencesPolitical ScienceDistributed SystemsKnowledge NetworksSocial InfluenceDisease SpreadInformation DiffusionInformation SpreadComplex NetworksComputational EfficiencyComputational Efficiency AnalysisIndependent Set AlgorithmsInformation SpreadingSpreadingSpreading ProcessesSpreading Processes On Networks
Identifying a set of influential spreaders in complex networks plays a crucial role in effective information spreading. A simple strategy is to choose top-r ranked nodes as spreaders according to influence ranking method such as PageRank, ClusterRank and k-shell decomposition. Besides, some heuristic methods such as hill-climbing, SPIN, degree discount and independent set based are also proposed. However, these approaches suffer from a possibility that some spreaders are so close together that they overlap sphere of influence or time consuming. In this report, we present a simply yet effectively iterative method named VoteRank to identify a set of decentralized spreaders with the best spreading ability. In this approach, all nodes vote in a spreader in each turn, and the voting ability of neighbors of elected spreader will be decreased in subsequent turn. Experimental results on four real networks show that under Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) and Susceptible-Infected (SI) models, VoteRank outperforms the traditional benchmark methods on both spreading rate and final affected scale. What's more, VoteRank has superior computational efficiency.
54
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Albert-Ĺaszló Barabási, Réka Albert · Science · 1999 · 36.4K citations · Full text
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Linton C. Freeman · Social Networks · 1978 · 16.9K citations
Complex networks: Structure and dynamics
Stefano Boccaletti, Vito Latora, Yamir Moreno et al. · Physics Reports · 2006 · 11K citations
Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment
Jon Kleinberg · Journal of the ACM · 1999 · 9.1K citations · Full text