BMC Anesthesiology · 2019 · 29 citations · 18 references
MedicineMaternal HealthObstetricsAnesthesiaMaternal MortalityObstetric AnesthesiaAirway AssessmentAirway ManagementAirway ObstructionAspiration RiskEndotracheal IntubationGeneral Anesthesia In ObstetricsAirway Management In PregnancyAirway Rescue ManeuversElective Cesarean SectionLaryngeal Mask Airway DevicesLaryngeal Mask Airway UseMaternal Surgical MorbidityObstetric Airway ManagementObstetric Intubation
BACKGROUND: The obstetric airway is a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Endotracheal intubation is considered the standard of care but the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has gained acceptance as a rescue airway and has been incorporated into the obstetric airway management guidelines. In this randomized controlled equivalence trial, we compared the Supreme LMA (SLMA) with endotracheal intubation (ETT) in managing the obstetric airway during cesarean section. METHODS: Parturients who underwent elective cesarean section under general anesthesia were randomized to receive either an SLMA or ETT as their airway device. Our primary outcome was first-attempt insertion success. Successful insertion was defined as adequate bilateral air entry with auscultation and the presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide on the capnogram. The first-attempt insertion success rate was compared using the Chi-Square test. Secondary outcomes included time-to-ventilation, seal pressure, ventilation/hemodynamic parameters, occurrence of clinical aspiration, fetal outcomes, and maternal side effects associated with the airway device. RESULTS: : 1.00 (95%CI: 0.25, 4.02), p = 1.0000). SLMA was associated with reduced time to effective ventilation (Mean Difference--MD -22.96; 95%CI: - 23.71, - 22.21 s) compared to ETT group (p < 0.0001). Ventilation parameters, maternal and fetal outcomes were similar between the groups, and there was no aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: SLMA could be an alternative airway management technique for a carefully selected low-risk obstetric population, with similar insertion success rates, reduced time to ventilation and less hemodynamic changes compared with ETT. Our findings are consistent with the airway guidelines in recommending the second-line use of LMA in the management of the obstetric airway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov , identifier: NCT01858467 , retrospectively registered. Date of registration: May 21, 2013.
18
Failed intubation revisited: 17-yr experience in a teaching maternity unit
Lauren Hawthorne, Rachel Wilson, G. Lyons et al. · British Journal of Anaesthesia · 1996 · 290 citations · Full text