Cancer Management and Research · 2019 · 22 citations · 46 references
MedicineMolecular MedicineOncologyGastrointestinal OncologyImmunotherapyMolecular OncologyCancer BiomarkersCancer ImmunotherapyGastric CancerImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMolecular Classification Of TumorsTumor ClassificationBiomarker-based ClassificationBiomarkers Of Gastric CancerImmunotherapy For Gastric CancerIntegrated Molecular ClassificationPd-l1 BlockadeProgrammed Cell Death Protein 1 (Pd-1) PathwayProgrammed Death-ligand 1 BiomarkerTumor-specific Biomarkers
Purpose: Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has emerged as a novel therapy for cancer. To identify rational candidates for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in gastric cancer (GC), the abundance of PD-L1 expression was evaluated on a kind of biomarker-based molecular classification for shaping prognosis and treatment planning. Methods: One hundred and sixty-five GCs were classified into five subgroups using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) methods, based on a panel of seven markers (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6, E-cadherin, P53, and Epstein-Barr virus mRNA). The expression of PD-L1 in GC tissues was analyzed immunohistochemically. Results: The five categories (Epstein–Barr virus positivity, microsatellite instability, aberrant E-cadherin, aberrant P53 expression, and normal P53 expression) correspond to the reported molecular subgroups for similar proportions and clinicopathologic characteristics. Survival analysis indicated that subgroups with aberrant E-cadherin expression independently predicted a worse prognosis in GC patients (HR=2.51, P =0.010). The clinical and prognostic profiles produced by this stratification in nonintestinal-type GC were distinguishable from those in intestinal-type. Although PD-L1 was not a significant prognostic factor, that more frequent presence of PD-L1-positive in microsatellite instability tumors than other subtypes ( P <0.010) hinted at a prolonged clinical course. Moreover, the lowest level of PD-L1 but the highest of Her2 was observed in the group of aberrant P53, namely it was suggested that there was a negative correlation between PD-L1 and Her2 overexpression. Conclusion: Different molecular subtypes in GC may have a tendency to react differently to anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy or anti-Her2 therapy. A combination of PD-L1 expression and this cost-effective classification strategy would be helpful for predicting prognosis and promoting personalized therapy in clinical practice. Keywords: PD-L1, molecular classification, gastric cancer, immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization
46
Safety, Activity, and Immune Correlates of Anti–PD-1 Antibody in Cancer
Suzanne L. Topalian, F. Stephen Hodi, Julie R. Brahmer et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2012 · 12.7K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +17
PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency
Dung T. Le, Jennifer N. Uram, Hao Wang et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 9.4K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +17
Yung‐Jue Bang, Eric Van Cutsem, A. Feyereislova et al. · The Lancet · 2010 · 7.3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +17
Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade
Dung T. Le, Jennifer N. Durham, Kellie N. Smith et al. · Science · 2017 · 6.6K citations
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +17