Invasive Assessment of the Human Arterial Palmar Arch and Forearm Collateral Function During Transradial Access

Marius Reto Bigler, Eric Buffle, George C.M. Siontis, Michael Stoller, R Grossenbacher, Christine Tschannen, Christian Seiler

Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions · 2019 · 11 citations · 19 references

Concepts

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to quantitatively measure the pressure-derived function of the palmar arch and forearm arterial collateral circulation during transradial access. Methods and Results: Palmar arch and forearm collateral function was determined using radial artery pressure signals in the nonobstructed vessel and during brief manual occlusions of the more proximal radial artery and of the radial plus ulnar arteries. Collateral flow index (CFI), the ratio of mean occlusive divided by mean nonocclusive arterial blood pressure, both subtracted by central venous pressure, was determined for CFI during radial artery occlusion (CFI rad ) and CFI during radial plus ulnar artery occlusion. Before invasive CFI measurements, arterial palmar arch and forearm function was tested noninvasively by the modified Allen test (MAT). Two hundred fifty patients undergoing transradial access coronary angiography were included in the study. CFI rad was equal to 0.802±0.150 (95% CI, 0.783–0.820). CFI during radial plus ulnar artery occlusion was equal to 0.424±0.188 (95% CI, 0.400–0.447). There was an inverse linear relation between CFI rad and MAT in seconds (s): MAT=64−63×CFI rad ( r 2 =0.229; P <0.0001). Two hundred eleven patients had a normal and 39 patients an abnormal (>15 seconds) MAT. The group with normal MAT had a CFI rad of 0.830±0.111, and patients with abnormal MAT had a CFI rad of 0.648±0.224 ( P <0.0001). Conclusions: Direct invasive hemodynamic assessment of the palmar arch and forearm arterial function reveals collateral supply to the briefly occluded in comparison to the patent radial artery of 0.802. During external occlusion of both radial and ulnar artery, CFI amounts to an unexpectedly high value of 0.424.

References

19