Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

A Comparative Study of PSO-ANN, GA-ANN, ICA-ANN, and ABC-ANN in Estimating the Heating Load of Buildings’ Energy Efficiency for Smart City Planning

316

Citations

66

References

2019

Year

TLDR

Energy efficiency is a critical issue in smart cities and underpins optimal city planning. The study proposes four AI techniques—ABC‑ANN, PSO‑ANN, ICA‑ANN, and GA‑ANN—to forecast building heating load for energy efficiency. The models were trained on 837 buildings using parameters such as glazing area, orientation, height, roof and wall areas, and compactness, and evaluated with RMSE, R², and MAE. GA‑ANN achieved the highest accuracy (RMSE 1.625, R² 0.980, MAE 0.798), outperforming PSO‑ANN, ICA‑ANN, and ABC‑ANN.

Abstract

Energy-efficiency is one of the critical issues in smart cities. It is an essential basis for optimizing smart cities planning. This study proposed four new artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for forecasting the heating load of buildings’ energy efficiency based on the potential of artificial neural network (ANN) and meta-heuristics algorithms, including artificial bee colony (ABC) optimization, particle swarm optimization (PSO), imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA), and genetic algorithm (GA). They were abbreviated as ABC-ANN, PSO-ANN, ICA-ANN, and GA-ANN models; 837 buildings were considered and analyzed based on the influential parameters, such as glazing area distribution (GLAD), glazing area (GLA), orientation (O), overall height (OH), roof area (RA), wall area (WA), surface area (SA), relative compactness (RC), for estimating heating load (HL). Three statistical criteria, such as root-mean-squared error (RMSE), coefficient determination (R2), and mean absolute error (MAE), were used to assess the potential of the aforementioned models. The results indicated that the GA-ANN model provided the highest performance in estimating the heating load of buildings’ energy efficiency, with an RMSE of 1.625, R2 of 0.980, and MAE of 0.798. The remaining models (i.e., PSO-ANN, ICA-ANN, ABC-ANN) yielded lower performance with RMSE of 1.932, 1.982, 1.878; R2 of 0.972, 0.970, 0.973; MAE of 1.027, 0.980, 0.957, respectively.

References

YearCitations

Page 1