arXiv (Cornell University) · 2013 · 45 citations · 9 references
EngineeringInformation SecurityTopology AuthenticationIpv6 Routing ProtocolFormal VerificationLossy NetworksHardware SecurityWireless SecurityInternet Of ThingsSecure ProtocolAuthentication ProtocolNetwork SecurityIdentity-based SecurityComputer ScienceData SecurityCryptographyProtective Scheme VeraEdge ComputingSecure RoutingSecurityAuthentication Access Control
The IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) was recently introduced as the new routing standard for the Internet of Things. Although RPL defines basic security modes, it remains vulnerable to topological attacks which facilitate blackholing, interception, and resource exhaustion. We are concerned with analyzing the corresponding threats and protecting future RPL deployments from such attacks. Our contributions are twofold. First, we analyze the state of the art, in particular the protective scheme VeRA and present two new rank order attacks as well as extensions to mitigate them. Second, we derive and evaluate TRAIL, a generic scheme for topology authentication in RPL. TRAIL solely relies on the basic assumptions of RPL that (1) the root node serves as a trust anchor and (2) each node interconnects to the root as part of a hierarchy. Using proper reachability tests, TRAIL scalably and reliably identifies any topological attacker without strong cryptographic efforts.
9
Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors
Burton H. Bloom · Communications of the ACM · 1970 · 7.4K citations · Full text
Energy Analysis of Public-Key Cryptography for Wireless Sensor Networks
Arvinderpal S. Wander, Nils Gura, Hans Eberle et al. · 2005 · 794 citations
Engineering, Information Security, Cryptographic Technology +16
Jamming sensor networks: attack and defense strategies
Wenyuan Xu, Ke Ma, Wade Trappe et al. · IEEE Network · 2006 · 661 citations
M. Mitzenmacher · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · 2002 · 523 citations