arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012 · 23 citations · 6 references
ComputingComputer ScienceAlgorithmsOptimizationTheory Of ComputationAutomated ReasoningBoolean AlgebraLinear ProgrammingOptimization TheorySatisfiability Modulo TheoriesBoolean Function MinimizationBoolean SatisfiabilityBoolean Satisfiability Modulo TheoriesDecision ProblemsFormal VerificationMinimizationMinimization Of Boolean FunctionsTheory Solvers
SMT has become a powerful tool for automated reasoning, yet few solvers support optimization over arithmetical variables, a capability needed for many practical problems. The paper aims to fill this gap by introducing methods to optimize linear arithmetic cost functions within SMT. The authors propose two general procedures that combine SMT with standard minimization techniques and evaluate the resulting implementation against LGDP benchmarks. Implementation in MathSAT shows the tool is competitive with, and often outperforms, state‑of‑the‑art LGDP solvers on benchmark problems.
In the contexts of automated reasoning and formal verification, important decision problems are effectively encoded into Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT). In the last decade efficient SMT solvers have been developed for several theories of practical interest (e.g., linear arithmetic, arrays, bit-vectors). Surprisingly, very few work has been done to extend SMT to deal with optimization problems; in particular, we are not aware of any work on SMT solvers able to produce solutions which minimize cost functions over arithmetical variables. This is unfortunate, since some problems of interest require this functionality. In this paper we start filling this gap. We present and discuss two general procedures for leveraging SMT to handle the minimization of LA(Q) cost functions, combining SMT with standard minimization techniques. We have implemented the proposed approach within the MathSAT SMT solver. Due to the lack of competitors in AR and SMT domains, we experimentally evaluated our implementation against state-of-the-art tools for the domain of linear generalized disjunctive programming (LGDP), which is closest in spirit to our domain, on sets of problems which have been previously proposed as benchmarks for the latter tools. The results show that our tool is very competitive with, and often outperforms, these tools on these problems, clearly demonstrating the potential of the approach.
6
Anthony Brook, David A. Kendrick, Alexander Meeraus · ACM SIGNUM Newsletter · 1988 · 3K citations
Efficient theory combination via boolean search
Marco Bozzano, Roberto Bruttomesso, Alessandro Cimatti et al. · Information and Computation · 2006 · 64 citations