Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Determination of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reorganization Energies with Application to Water Oxidation Catalysts

32

Citations

45

References

2019

Year

Abstract

The reorganization energy, λ, for interfacial electron transfer (ET) and for proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) between a water oxidation catalyst and a conductive In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Sn (ITO) oxide were extracted from kinetic data by application of Marcus-Gerischer theory. Specifically, light excitation of the water oxidation catalyst [Ru<sup>II</sup>(tpy)(4,4'-(PO<sub>3</sub>H<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>-bpy)OH<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (Ru<sup>II</sup>-OH<sub>2</sub>), where tpy is 2,2':6',2″-terpyridine and bpy is 2,2'-bipyridine, anchored to a mesoporous thin film of ITO nanocrystallites resulted in rapid excited-state injection ( k<sub>inj</sub> > 10<sup>8</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>). The subsequent reaction of the injected electron (ITO(e<sup>-</sup>)) and the oxidized catalyst was quantified spectroscopically on nanosecond and longer time scales. The metallic character of ITO allowed potentiostatic control of the reaction free energy change -Δ G<sup>o</sup> over a 1 eV range. At pH values below the p K<sub>a</sub> = 1.7 of the oxidized catalyst, ET was the primary reaction. Within the pH range 2 ≤ pH ≤ 5, an interfacial PCET reaction (ITO(e<sup>-</sup>) + Ru<sup>III</sup>-OH + H<sup>+</sup>→ Ru<sup>II</sup>-OH<sub>2</sub>) occurred with smaller rate constants. Plots of the rate constants versus -Δ G<sup>o</sup> provided a reorganization energy of λ<sub>PCET</sub> = 0.9 eV and λ<sub>ET</sub> = 0.5 eV. A second water oxidation catalyst provided similar values and demonstrated generality. The utilization of conductive oxides is shown to be a powerful tool for quantifying PCET reorganization energies at oxide surfaces for the first time.

References

YearCitations

Page 1