2019 · 27 citations · 22 references
ComputingComputer ScienceCybersecurityApplication SecurityMobile ComputingMobile SecurityApplication Security TestingBrowser SecurityContent Security PolicyMobile Device SecurityWeb Application SecurityWeb Application TestingAndroid Application Security TestingBrowser Security Policy EnforcementContent SecurityContent Security Policy TestingMobile Application Security TestingSecurity MechanismsSecurity TestingWeb Application Security Testing
Recent market share statistics show that mobile device traffic has overtaken that of traditional desktop computers. Users spend an increasing amount of time on their smartphones and tablets, while the web continues to be the platform of choice for delivering new applications to users. In this environment, it is necessary for web applications to utilize all the tools at their disposal to protect mobile users against popular web application attacks. In this paper, we perform the first study of the support of popular web-application security mechanisms (such as the Content-Security Policy, HTTP Strict Transport Security, and Referrer Policy) across mobile browsers. We design 395 individual tests covering 8 different security mechanisms, and utilize them to evaluate the security-mechanism support in the 20 most popular browser families on Android. Moreover, by collecting and testing browser versions from the last seven years, we evaluate a total of 351 unique browser versions against the aforementioned tests, collecting more than 138K test results.
22
Robust defenses for cross-site request forgery
Adam Barth, Collin Jackson, John C. Mitchell · 2008 · 413 citations
Nick Nikiforakis, Luca Invernizzi, Alexandros Kapravelos et al. · 2012 · 278 citations · Full text
Attacks on WebView in the Android system
Tongbo Luo, Hao Hao, Wenliang Du et al. · 2011 · 190 citations
Busting frame busting a study of clickjacking vulnerabilities on popular sites
Gustav Rydstedt, Elie Bursztein, Dan Boneh et al. · 2010 · 113 citations