BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · 2019 · 32 citations · 18 references
MedicineCardiologySurgeryCardiothoracic SurgeryClinical CardiologyInterventional CardiologyCardiac Valve SurgeryCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary Artery SurgeryPercutaneous Coronary InterventionTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTranscatheter Valve TherapyCatheter-based Valve InterventionClinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary InterventionHigh-risk Surgical PatientsMinimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingOff-pump Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingOn-pump Coronary Artery Bypass
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with poorer outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). For high-risk patients with complex CAD, combined transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) plus off-pump/minimally-invasive coronary artery bypass (OPCAB/MIDCAB) has been proposed. METHODS: A prospective registry analysis was performed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR+OP/MIDCAB with those undergoing TAVR plus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and surgical AVR plus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2008 and 2015 at a single site in Germany. RESULTS: 464 patients underwent SAVR+CABG, 50 underwent TAVR+OP/MIDCAB, and 112 underwent TAVR+PCI. The mean ages (p < 0.001) and logistic EuroSCOREs (p < 0.001) were similarly higher in TAVR+OP/MIDCAB and TAVR+PCI patients compared to SAVR+CABG patients. Prior cardiac surgery was more common in TAVR+PCI than in TAVR+OP/MIDCAB and SAVR+CABG patients (p < 0.001). Procedural times were shortest (p < 0.001), creatine kinase (muscle brain) levels least elevated (p < 0.001), pericardial tamponade least common (p = 0.027), and length of hospital stay shortest (p = 0.011) in TAVR+PCI, followed by TAVR+OP/MIDCAB and SAVR+CABG patients. In-hospital mortality was highest for TAVR+OP/MIDCAB patients (18.0%) with comparable rates for TAVR+PCI and SAVR+CABG groups (9.0 and 6.9%; p = 0.009). Mortality by 12 months was more probable after TAVR+OP/MIDCAB (HR: 2.17, p = 0.002) and TAVR/PCI (HR: 1.63, p = 0.010) than after SAVR+CABG, with the same true of rehospitalisation (HR: 2.39, p = 0.003 and HR: 1.63, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: TAVR+OP/MIDCAB patients share many characteristics with TAVR+PCI patients, with only slightly poorer long-term outcomes. In patients ineligible for SAVR+CABG and TAVR+PCI, hybrid interventions are reasonable second-line options.
18
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Philippe Kolh, Stephan Windecker, Fernándo Alfonso et al. · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2014 · 4.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +14
One year follow-up of the multi-centre European PARTNER transcatheter heart valve study
T. Lefèvre, A. Pieter Kappetein, Ernst Wolner et al. · European Heart Journal · 2010 · 377 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +17
Peter Wenaweser, Thomas Pilgrim, Ênio Eduardo Guérios et al. · EuroIntervention · 2011 · 191 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +15
Young‐Hak Kim, Duk‐Woo Park, Won‐Jang Kim et al. · JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · 2010 · 168 citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +14
Mohamed Abdel‐Wahab, Ahmad E. Mostafa, Volker Geist et al. · The American Journal of Cardiology · 2012 · 145 citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +12