Journal of Ovarian Research · 2019 · 12 citations · 27 references
MedicineMolecular GeneticsOncologyApoptosisMitochondrial BiologyMolecular OncologyApoptosis In CancerApoptosis ResistanceGene Fusions In CancerMitochondrial FusionMitochondrial ToxicityOvarian CancerApoptosis TargetingApoptotic ResponseMitochondrial Apoptosis PathwaysP53-mediated ApoptosisP53-mediated Cell DeathPro-apoptotic EffectorsTherapeutic Targeting Of Fusion ProteinsTumor Suppressor P53
BACKGROUND: Despite years of research, the treatment options and mortality rate for ovarian cancer remain relatively stagnant. Resistance to chemotherapy and high heterogeneity in mutations contribute to ovarian cancer's lethality, including many mutations in tumor suppressor p53. Though wild type p53 gene therapy clinical trials failed in ovarian cancer, mitochondrially-targeted p53 fusion constructs, including a fusion with pro-apoptotic protein Bad, have shown much higher apoptotic potential than wild type p53 in vitro. Due to the inherent toxicities of mitochondrial apoptosis, cancer-specificity for the p53 fusion constructs must be developed. Cancer-specific promoters such as hTERT, hTC, Brms1, and Ran have shown promise in ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Of five different lengths of hTERT promoter, the - 279/+ 5 length relative to the transcription start site showed the highest activity across a panel of ovarian cancer cells. In addition to - 279/+ 5, promoters hTC (an hTERT/CMV promoter hybrid), Brms1, and Ran were tested as drivers of mitochondrially-targeted p53-Bad and p53-Bad* fusion gene therapy constructs. p53-Bad* displayed cancer-specific killing in all ovarian cancer cell lines when driven by hTC, - 279/+ 5, or Brms1. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer-specific promoters hTC, - 279/+ 5, and Brms1 all display promise in driving p53-Bad* gene therapy for treatment of ovarian cancer and should be moved forward into in vivo studies. -279/+ 5 displays lower expression levels in fewer cells, but greater cancer specificity, rendering it most useful for gene therapeutics with high toxicity to normal cells. hTC and Brms1 show higher transfection and expression levels with some cancer specificity, making them ideal for lowering toxicity in order to increase dose without as much of a reduction in the number of cancer cells expressing the gene construct. Having a variety of promoters available means that patient genetic testing can aid in choosing a promoter, thereby increasing cancer-specificity and giving patients with ovarian cancer a greater chance at survival.
27
Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma
Debra Bell, Andrew Berchuck, Narciso Olvera et al. · Nature · 2011 · 8.2K citations · Full text
Bad, a heterodimeric partner for Bcl-xL and Bcl-2, displaces bax and promotes cell death
Elizabeth Yang, Jiping Zha, Jennifer Jockel et al. · Cell · 1995 · 2.1K citations · Full text
COSMIC: somatic cancer genetics at high-resolution
Simon Forbes, David Beare, Harry Boutselakis et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 2016 · 2.1K citations · Full text
Evaluating cell lines as tumour models by comparison of genomic profiles
Silvia Domcke, Rileen Sinha, Douglas A. Levine et al. · Nature Communications · 2013 · 1.5K citations · Full text