SSRN Electronic Journal · 1995 · 90 citations · 0 references
Social SciencesCommunicationScience CommunicationBibliometric AnalysisScience Communication PolicyScience-technology-society RelationshipsScientific WritingScience Communication AnalyticsScience Communication MetricsScientometric Indicators
Scientometrics demonstrates that organized knowledge production and control can be quantitatively measured, challenging traditional science and technology studies. The study aims to show that mathematical theory of communication can address key qualitative and quantitative problems in science and technology studies. The author develops a methodological framework using probabilistic entropy measures to analyze scientific communication, applying it to policy questions, Bayesian knowledge representation, and self‑organizing paradigms. The study concludes with a discussion outlining directions for future research.
Scientometrics — the quantitative study of scientific communication — challenges science and technology studies by demonstrating that organized knowledge production and control is amenable to measurement. First, the various dimensions of the empirical study of the sciences are clarified in a methodological analysis of theoretical traditions, including the sociology of scientific knowledge and neo-conventionalism in the philosophy of science. Second, the author argues why the mathematical theory of communication enables us to address crucial problems in science and technology studies, both on the qualitative side (e.g., the significance of a reconstruction) and on the quantitative side (e.g., the prediction of indicators). A comprehensive set of probabilistic entropy measures for studying complex developments in networks is elaborated. In the third part of the study, applications to S&T policy questions (e.g., the emergence of a European R&D system), to problems of (Bayesian) knowledge representations, and to the study of the sciences in terms of ‘self-organizing’ paradigms of scientific communication are provided. A discussion of directions for further research concludes the study.