Diabetes Therapy · 2019 · 30 citations · 52 references
PharmacyEndocrinologyPharmacotherapyCost-effectiveness AnalysisMeta-analysisPharmacoeconomic ModelingClinical TrialsDiabetes ManagementDiabetes MellitusGlucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlycemic ControlNetwork Meta-analysisBasal Insulin TherapyCost-effectiveness Analysis PerspectiveGlucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor AgonismGlucagon-like PeptidesHemoglobin LevelsLong-term Cost-effectiveness ModelingOnce-weekly FormulationsSmall-molecule Glp-1 Receptor Agonists
INTRODUCTION: Once-weekly semaglutide is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) that has been associated with greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight versus GLP-1 receptor agonists dulaglutide, exenatide extended-release (ER), liraglutide and lixisenatide in the SUSTAIN trial program and a network meta-analysis (NMA). The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of semaglutide versus all available GLP-1 receptor agonists in Denmark, using a clinically orientated treatment approach. METHODS: Outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model. Baseline characteristics and treatment effects were sourced from the corresponding SUSTAIN trials and the NMA. Patients were assumed to initiate GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy and subsequently treatment-intensify according to clinical treatment guidelines, with addition of basal insulin and switching to basal-bolus insulin occurring when HbA1c exceeded recommended targets. Patients were assumed to receive a GLP-1 receptor agonist plus basal insulin therapy once HbA1c levels reached 7.5% and a basal-bolus insulin regimen once HbA1c exceeded 8.0%. Costs were captured in 2017 Danish kroner (DKK), with future costs and outcomes discounted at 3% per annum. RESULTS: Primary analyses indicated that semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.11 and 0.34 quality-adjusted life years, respectively, versus dulaglutide, achieved at cost savings of DKK 289 and DKK 13,416, respectively. Supporting analyses indicated that both doses of semaglutide were either cost-effective or dominant versus exenatide ER, liraglutide 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg and lixisenatide. CONCLUSION: Semaglutide represents a cost-effective alternative to other GLP-1 receptor agonist therapies available in Denmark, demonstrating clinical benefits versus dulaglutide, exenatide ER, liraglutide and lixisenatide for the treatment of patients with T2D. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. Plain language summary available for this article.
52
R. C. Turner, Charles Fox, Matthews et al. · The Lancet · 1998 · 8.4K citations
10-Year Follow-up of Intensive Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes
Rury R. Holman, Sanjoy K. Paul, M. Angelyn Bethel et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2008 · 7.8K citations · Full text
Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
Steven P. Marso, Gilbert H. Daniels, Kirstine Brown‐Frandsen et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 7.3K citations · Full text