International Journal of Cancer · 2019 · 89 citations · 51 references
MedicineGeneticsOncologyBreast OncologyCancer GeneticsMolecular OncologyCancer GenomicsCancer Molecular PathologyGenetic Risk AssessmentGermline Cancer PredispositionGermline Cancer SusceptibilityGermline Variant InterpretationAssayChek2-related Cancer PredispositionComplementationComplementation TestingGermline Cancer Predisposition SyndromesMutationPathogenic Variant ClassificationRisk
Germline mutations in checkpoint kinase 2 ( CHEK2 ), a multiple cancer‐predisposing gene, increase breast cancer (BC) risk; however, risk estimates differ substantially in published studies. We analyzed germline CHEK2 variants in 1,928 high‐risk Czech breast/ovarian cancer (BC/OC) patients and 3,360 population‐matched controls (PMCs). For a functional classification of VUS, we developed a complementation assay in human nontransformed RPE1‐ CHEK2 ‐knockout cells quantifying CHK2‐specific phosphorylation of endogenous protein KAP1. We identified 10 truncations in 46 (2.39%) patients and in 11 (0.33%) PMC ( p = 1.1 × 10 −14 ). Two types of large intragenic rearrangements (LGR) were found in 20/46 mutation carriers. Truncations significantly increased unilateral BC risk (OR = 7.94; 95%CI 3.90–17.47; p = 1.1 × 10 −14 ) and were more frequent in patients with bilateral BC (4/149; 2.68%; p = 0.003), double primary BC/OC (3/79; 3.80%; p = 0.004), male BC (3/48; 6.25%; p = 8.6 × 10 −4 ), but not with OC (3/354; 0.85%; p = 0.14). Additionally, we found 26 missense VUS in 88 (4.56%) patients and 131 (3.90%) PMC ( p = 0.22). Using our functional assay, 11 variants identified in 15 (0.78%) patients and 6 (0.18%) PMC were scored deleterious ( p = 0.002). Frequencies of functionally intermediate and neutral variants did not differ between patients and PMC. Functionally deleterious CHEK2 missense variants significantly increased BC risk (OR = 3.90; 95%CI 1.24–13.35; p = 0.009) and marginally OC risk (OR = 4.77; 95%CI 0.77–22.47; p = 0.047); however, carriers low frequency will require evaluation in larger studies. Our study highlights importance of LGR detection for CHEK2 analysis, careful consideration of ethnicity in both cases and controls for risk estimates, and demonstrates promising potential of newly developed human nontransformed cell line assay for functional CHEK2 VUS classification.
51
DNA Damage-Induced Activation of p53 by the Checkpoint Kinase Chk2
Atsushi Hirao, Young‐Yun Kong, Shuhei Matsuoka et al. · Science · 2000 · 1.3K citations
Gene-Panel Sequencing and the Prediction of Breast-Cancer Risk
Douglas F. Easton, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Antonis C. Antoniou et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 937 citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Genetics, Oncology +17
Inherited Mutations in Women With Ovarian Carcinoma
Barbara M. Norquist, Maria I. Harrell, Mark F. Brady et al. · JAMA Oncology · 2015 · 764 citations · Full text
Spectrum of Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in Families at High Risk of Breast Cancer
Tom Walsh, Silvia Casadei, Kathryn Hale Coats et al. · JAMA · 2006 · 666 citations