Journal of Primary Care & Community Health · 2019 · 36 citations · 19 references
EducationKinesiologySports MedicineExercise PhysiologyExercise TestingPhysical ActivityExercise AssessmentFitness AssessmentPhysical Activity AssessmentPhysical FitnessVital SignsVital Signs AssessmentAccelerometer SensorsExercise Test ReliabilityExercise Test ValidityIntraclass CorrelationPhysical Activity QuestionnairesQuestionnaire ReliabilityQuestionnaire ValiditySelf-report Physical Activity Assessment
The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the Exercise Vital Sign (EVS) questionnaire in an ethnically diverse sample. Participants (N = 39) were asked to wear an accelerometer at the hip for at least 7 days and to complete the EVS at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of the wear period. The EVS questionnaire validity was determined against accelerometry, and bias was calculated as the mean difference between measures. The sensitivity and specificity of the EVS questionnaire were also evaluated. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between EVS responses at T1 and T2. The mean difference in EVS- and accelerometer-determined time in MVPA was 24 min/wk. The reliability for the questionnaire was excellent (ICC = 0.98). The EVS specificity and sensitivity at T2 were 56% and 78%, respectively. The EVS questionnaire may be an acceptable measure of weekly MVPA time compared to accelerometry in an ethnically diverse sample; however, further research is needed to confirm these findings.
19
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans
Katrina L. Piercy, Richard P. Troiano, Rachel Ballard et al. · JAMA · 2018 · 9.7K citations · Full text
Public Health, Chronic Disease Prevention, Health Promotion +12
Carol Ewing Garber, Bryan Blissmer, Michael R. Deschenes et al. · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2011 · 9.1K citations · Full text