Energies · 2019 · 257 citations · 36 references
AgricultureData ScienceForecastingMachine LearningRenewable Energy SystemsForecast EvaluationRenewable EnergySolar CellsSolar Energy SystemsSolar Photovoltaic SystemsSolar RadiationDay-ahead ForecastingPhotovoltaic Energy SystemsPhotovoltaic Power ForecastingPhotovoltaic SystemsPower OutputRenewable Energy ForecastingRenewable ForecastingSolar Power Forecasting
We compare the 24-hour ahead forecasting performance of two methods commonly used for the prediction of the power output of photovoltaic systems. Both methods are based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), which have been trained on the same dataset, thus enabling a much-needed homogeneous comparison currently lacking in the available literature. The dataset consists of an hourly series of simultaneous climatic and PV system parameters covering an entire year, and has been clustered to distinguish sunny from cloudy days and separately train the ANN. One forecasting method feeds only on the available dataset, while the other is a hybrid method as it relies upon the daily weather forecast. For sunny days, the first method shows a very good and stable prediction performance, with an almost constant Normalized Mean Absolute Error, NMAE%, in all cases (1% < NMAE% < 2%); the hybrid method shows an even better performance (NMAE% < 1%) for two of the days considered in this analysis, but overall a less stable performance (NMAE% > 2% and up to 5.3% for all the other cases). For cloudy days, the forecasting performance of both methods typically drops; the performance is rather stable for the method that does not use weather forecasts, while for the hybrid method it varies significantly for the days considered in the analysis.
36
Review of photovoltaic power forecasting
J. Antonanzas, Natalia Osorio, Rodrigo Escobar et al. · Solar Energy · 2016 · 1.3K citations
Richard E. Bird, C. Riordan · Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology · 1986 · 820 citations · Full text