International Journal of Osteoarchaeology · 2019 · 12 citations · 10 references
HumanitiesAnthropologyArchaeologyNear Eastern ArchaeologyPrehistoric ArchaeologyZooarchaeologyArchaeological ContextBronze Age ArchaeologyFaunal Remains AnalysisFunerary ArchaeologyNeolithic ArchaeologyPrehistoric Near Eastern ArchaeologyAnthropogenic InclusionsBronze Age Funerary ArchaeologySymbolic Meaning
Abstract The inclusion of faunal remains in funerary practices is widely documented in Iberian prehistory. For the late prehistory (Neolithic to Bronze Age), there is relatively more data than in earlier periods, with limb segments being very common, and complete animals are rarer. In Bronze Age contexts from South‐Western Iberia, a high percentage of human burials in subterranean chambers (hypogea) are associated with limb bones of cattle ( Bos taurus ) and sheep/goats ( Ovis/Capra ), along with other grave goods. Traditionally, this practice is interpreted as the result of rituals of commensality. In this paper, we present a different perspective. Besides commensality, we show that the inclusion of the same species and the same anatomical parts is a highly standardised behaviour. Beyond the tight connection between humans and animals, this pattern also points to a strong symbolism of these domestic species and to symbolic meaning of the anatomical parts themselves.
10
IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP
Radiocarbon · 2010 · 10K citations · Full text
Social zooarchaeology: humans and animals in prehistory
Choice Reviews Online · 2012 · 321 citations
The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of death and burial
Choice Reviews Online · 2014 · 166 citations
Antonio Blanco González, Katina T. Lillios, B Lee Drake · Journal of World Prehistory · 2018 · 135 citations