Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Toward a Common Understanding of Ocean Multi-Use

131

Citations

39

References

2019

Year

TLDR

The open ocean has become increasingly contested due to growing coastal populations and intensified maritime uses, posing significant challenges that maritime spatial planning seeks to address, yet single‑sector approaches remain common, prompting the emergence of a multi‑use concept. The paper seeks to clarify and refine ocean multi‑use by reviewing European developments, defining the concept, and providing a typology, thereby offering a common framework to advance marine spatial planning discourse. The authors base their framework on the connectivity of uses and users across spatial, temporal, provisional, and functional dimensions. The analysis identifies four distinct, largely non‑overlapping multi‑use types, illustrating that adaptive management plans are required to maximize societal benefit while minimizing conflicts.

Abstract

The 'open ocean' has become a highly contested space as coastal populations and maritime uses surfaced in abundance and intensity over the last decades. Changing marine utilization patterns represent a considerable challenge to society and governments. Maritime spatial planning has emerged as one tool to manage conflicts between users and achieve societal goals for the use of marine space; however single-sector management approaches are too often still the norm. The last decades have seen the rise of a new ocean use concept: the joint 'multi-use' of ocean space. This paper aims to explain and refine the concept of ocean multi-use of space by reviewing the development and state of the art of multi-use in Europe and presenting a clear definition and a comprehensive typology for existing multi-use combinations. It builds on the connectivity of uses and users in spatial, temporal, provisional, and functional dimensions as the underlying key characteristic of multi-use dimensions. Combinations of these dimensions yield four distinct types of multi-use with little overlap between them. The diversity of types demonstrates that there is no one-size-fits-all management approach, but rather that adaptive management plans are needed, focusing on achieving the highest societal benefit while minimising conflicts. This work will help to sharpen, refine and advance the public and academic discourse over marine spatial planning by offering a common framework to planners, researchers and users alike, when discussing multi-use and its management implications.

References

YearCitations

Page 1