arXiv (Cornell University) · 2019 · 34 citations · 37 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputational LinguisticsNatural Language ProcessingVisual AttentionEye Movement AnalysisLanguage ProcessingNamed Entity RecognitionNatural Language UnderstandingSentiment AnalysisWord RecognitionCognitive Information Processing ApproachEye Movement Feature ExtractionEye Tracking In ReadingGaze Behavior AnalysisGaze TrackingHuman Information ProcessingRelation ClassificationText Feature Fusion
When we read, our brain processes language and generates cognitive processing data such as gaze patterns and brain activity. These signals can be recorded while reading. Cognitive language processing data such as eye-tracking features have shown improvements on single NLP tasks. We analyze whether using such human features can show consistent improvement across tasks and data sources. We present an extensive investigation of the benefits and limitations of using cognitive processing data for NLP. Specifically, we use gaze and EEG features to augment models of named entity recognition, relation classification, and sentiment analysis. These methods significantly outperform the baselines and show the potential and current limitations of employing human language processing data for NLP.
37
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Tomáš Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg S. Corrado et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2013 · 11.7K citations · Full text
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Richard Socher, Alex Perelygin, Jean Y. Wu et al. · 2013 · 6.8K citations · Full text
Rich Caruana · Machine Learning · 1997 · 6.3K citations · Full text
Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognition
Guillaume Lample, Miguel Ballesteros, Sandeep Subramanian et al. · 2016 · 4.4K citations · Full text