Analytic Philosophy · 2019 · 15 citations · 15 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsDiscourse AnalysisPragmaticsRhetoricFigurative LanguageFigures Of SpeechIdeas Of ReferenceReference By DescriptionReferential RepresentationReferential SemanticsReferring Expression UnderstandingSingular Thought
Discussing Keith Donnellan's distinction between attributive and referential uses of descriptions, Gareth Evans considered a speaker he found it natural to describe as having “given expression to” a singular thought, though he insisted she was not referring to the person she has in mind. On accounts otherwise similar to Evans's, to express a singular thought just is to refer. Thus, as he does not explain why this speaker might speak this way, it is tempting to ignore this as a slip. On the contrary, I shall argue, Evans has good reason to deny that picture of reference. My interest, though, is in the case itself. It turns out it is a presentational use of descriptions: it provides its audience a cognitive ability they would otherwise lack. This characterization raises deep theoretical questions which I only begin to address here. My goal is to show that we ought to address those questions, for there is no better way of understanding examples like Evans's than to see them as presentational.
15
Reference and Definite Descriptions
Keith S. Donnellan · The Philosophical Review · 1966 · 2.5K citations
Scorekeeping in a language game
David Lewis · Journal of Philosophical Logic · 1979 · 2.4K citations
BERTRAND RUSSELL · Mind · 1905 · 2.3K citations
Pronouns, Quantifiers, and Relative Clauses (l)
Gareth Lloyd Evans · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · 1977 · 343 citations
Humanities, Linguistics, Philosophy +10