Publication | Open Access
The Return to Protectionism*
748
Citations
42
References
2019
Year
Trade CostsInternational EconomicsTradeAgricultural EconomicsLawAdministrative LawU.s. EconomyPolicy AnalysisU.s. ConsumersEconomic Policy AnalysisServices TradeEconomic AnalysisCommercial PolicyEconomic ImpactsConsumer ProtectionPublic PolicyEconomicsTrade LiberalizationImport TariffsNational SecurityTrade WarsTrade PolicyProtectionismEconomic PolicyTrade EconomicsBusinessSecurity
After decades of supporting free trade, the United States raised import tariffs in 2018, prompting retaliatory tariffs from major trade partners. The study analyzes the short‑run impact of the 2018 protectionist tariff shift on the U.S. economy. The authors embed estimated trade elasticities in a general‑equilibrium model of the U.S. economy.
Abstract After decades of supporting free trade, in 2018 the United States raised import tariffs and major trade partners retaliated. We analyze the short-run impact of this return to protectionism on the U.S. economy. Import and retaliatory tariffs caused large declines in imports and exports. Prices of imports targeted by tariffs did not fall, implying complete pass-through of tariffs to duty-inclusive prices. The resulting losses to U.S. consumers and firms that buy imports was $51 billion, or 0.27% of GDP. We embed the estimated trade elasticities in a general-equilibrium model of the U.S. economy. After accounting for tariff revenue and gains to domestic producers, the aggregate real income loss was $7.2 billion, or 0.04% of GDP. Import tariffs favored sectors concentrated in politically competitive counties, and the model implies that tradeable-sector workers in heavily Republican counties were the most negatively affected due to the retaliatory tariffs. JEL Code: F1.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1