Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy

Abstract

PURPOSE: To directly compare the utility for therapeutic outcome prediction of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE)-perfusion area-detector computed tomography (ADCT), MR imaging assessed with the same mathematical method and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography combined with CT (PET/CT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: on PET/CT, assessed for each targeted lesion, and averaged to determine final values. Receiver operating characteristics analyses were performed to compare the utility for distinguishing responders from non-responders using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Overall survival (OS) assessed with each index were compared between two groups by means of the Kaplan-Meier method followed by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Area under the curve (Az) for total perfusion on ADCT was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Az of total perfusion on MR imaging was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Mean OS of responder and non-responder groups were significantly different for total and systemic arterial (P < 0.05) perfusion. CONCLUSION: Dynamic first-pass CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging as well as PET/CT are useful for early prediction of treatment response by NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.