Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie · 2019 · 36 citations · 8 references
HumanitiesPhilosophyPhilosophy Of LawPhilosophy Of MindTheory Of JusticeAbsurdismKantian PhilosophyMoral JudgmentMoral ConscienceMoral Judgement
Abstract This article explores Kant’s view, found in several passages in his late writings on moral philosophy, that the verdicts of conscience are infallible. We argue that Kant’s infallibility claim must be seen in the context of a major shift in Kant’s views on conscience that took place around 1790 and that has not yet been sufficiently appreciated in the literature. This shift led Kant to treat conscience as an exclusively second-order capacity which does not directly evaluate actions, but one’s first-order moral judgments and deliberation. On the basis of this novel interpretation, we develop a new defence of Kant’s infallibility claim that draws on Kant’s account of the characteristic features of specifically moral judgments.
8
De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo
C. G. Fenwick, C. H. Oldfather, W. A. Oldfather et al. · University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register · 1935 · 398 citations
The Internal Forum and the Literature of Penance and Confession
Joseph Goering · Traditio · 2004 · 108 citations
Owen Ware · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · 2009 · 104 citations · Full text
Kant on Conscience, “Indirect” Duty, and Moral Error
Jens Timmermann · International Philosophical Quarterly · 2006 · 100 citations
Humanities, Philosophy, Ethics +11
The Internal Forum and the Literature of Penance and Confession
Joseph Goering · Traditio · 2004 · 70 citations