German Law Journal · 2018 · 10 citations · 1 references
Social SciencesConstitutional LawPolitical ScienceConstitutional TheoryJudicial PoliticsSeparation Of PowersDemocracyJudicial AccountabilityJudicial IndependenceJudicial InstitutionsConstitutional Amendment AuthorityConstitutional Amendment InteractionConstitutional Amendment InterpretationDe Facto Judicial IndependenceDe Jure Judicial IndependenceJudicial Institutional Design
Abstract Typically, Germany is portrayed as a persistent objector to Judicial Self-Government in any form. The present paper will demonstrate that this position is untenable: Actually, the German judiciary disposes of a differentiated system of institutions of self-government. The effects of these institutional settings on core values like independence and accountability proves to be mixed at best, however. Furthermore, there are practically no proponents of a stronger version of self-government to be reckoned with. Indeed, the Italian-style model of self-government or the visions of the CCJE are basically contrary to the prevailing German understanding of democratic legitimacy and separation of powers; moreover, the long lasting recruiting pattern of the German judiciary will act as a powerful obstacle. Ultimately, even the introduction of a strong self-government via constitutional amendment remains an open question.
1
Suing judges: a study of judicial immunity
Choice Reviews Online · 1994 · 18 citations
Law, Jurisprudence, Public Law +13