Art, Creativity, and the Potential of Artificial Intelligence

TLDR

The essay examines AICAN, an AI art‑making process, and the broader questions it raises about art and artists in the 21st century. The authors argue that AICAN’s works should be regarded as art, that machine creativity should be defined alongside human creativity, and that a partnership between humans and machines can maximize creative potential. They developed AI methods for art creation, style analysis, and large‑scale.

Abstract

Our essay discusses an AI process developed for making art (AICAN), and the issues AI creativity raises for understanding art and artists in the 21st century. Backed by our training in computer science (Elgammal) and art history (Mazzone), we argue for the consideration of AICAN’s works as art, relate AICAN works to the contemporary art context, and urge a reconsideration of how we might define human and machine creativity. Our work in developing AI processes for art making, style analysis, and detecting large-scale style patterns in art history has led us to carefully consider the history and dynamics of human art-making and to examine how those patterns can be modeled and taught to the machine. We advocate for a connection between machine creativity and art broadly defined as parallel to but not in conflict with human artists and their emotional and social intentions of art making. Rather, we urge a partnership between human and machine creativity when called for, seeing in this collaboration a means to maximize both partners’ creative strengths.