Advances in Wound Care · 2019 · 14 citations · 30 references
Health ProfessionsOrthopaedic SurgerySurgeryDiabetic Foot CareFoot SurgeryWound HealingDiabetic Foot DiseaseDiabetic Foot SurgeryDiabetic Foot Ulcer CareDiabetic Foot UlcerationDiabetic Neuropathic FootFoot Ulcer PreventionAutologous Platelet ConcentratesDiabetic Wound HealingDiabetic Wound RepairHealing Time EvaluationMatched Control GroupPrimary Outcome AnalysisUlcer Healing TimeWound Healing Rate Assessment
Objectives: The meta-analysis was performed to summarize the available evidence and determine the healing effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich gel (APG) on diabetic foot (DF) wounds. Approach: PubMed and The Cochrane Library and CNKI databases were searched to identify prior randomized controlled trials. Methodological qualities of included studies were assessed using Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention. Healing rate was considered the primary outcome; the secondary outcomes included healing time and adverse events. Results: Fifteen studies involving a total of 827 subjects were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Considering the primary outcome, the average healing rate in APG group was 85.8% and ranged from 68.4% to 100%. Relatively, the control group was 57.4% and ranged from 18.2% to 75.0%. Eligible studies were compared with a fixed effects model ( I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.496), indicating a higher healing rate with APG (risk ratio [RR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32–1.57, z = 8.50, p < 0.001). The leave-one-out sensitivity analysis is robust. Considering the secondary outcomes, APG therapy needed less time (weighted mean difference −10.75 days, 95% CI: −11.67 to 8.86 days, z = 14.34, p < 0.001) and had fewer adverse events (RR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.25–0.76, z = 2.94, p = 0.003). Innovation: APG therapy is an innovative and effective approach to promote DF wound healing and reduce healing time and adverse events. Conclusion: The meta-analysis demonstrates that APG therapy has a positive effect on the treatment of DF wounds. However, additional well-designed and high-quality studies are needed to reach a conclusion with more confidence.
30
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
Rebecca DerSimonian, Nan M. Laird · Controlled Clinical Trials · 1986 · 39.3K citations
Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses
Alex J. Sutton · BMJ · 2000 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Burden of Diabetic Foot Ulcers for Medicare and Private Insurers
J. Bradford Rice, Urvi Desai, Alice Kate G. Cummings et al. · Diabetes Care · 2013 · 604 citations · Full text
Peter Sheehan, Peter Jones, Antonella Caselli et al. · Diabetes Care · 2003 · 577 citations · Full text