Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy

69

Citations

18

References

2019

Year

Abstract

There is good agreement when comparing radiographer contours to the gold-standard for all three imaging types with Dice similarity co-efficient 0.91-0.94, Cohen's κ 0.85-0.91, Hausdorff distance 4.6-7.6 mm and mean distance between contours 0.9-1.2 mm. In addition, there is good concordance between radiographers across all imaging modalities. Both T<sub>2</sub>W and T<sub>2</sub>*W MRI show reduced interobserver variability and improved accuracy compared to CT, this was statistically significant for T<sub>2</sub>*W imaging compared to CT across all four comparison metrics. Comparing MRI sequences reveals significantly reduced interobserver variability and significantly improved accuracy on T<sub>2</sub>*W compared to T<sub>2</sub>W MRI for DSC and Cohen's κ. Both MRI sequences scored significantly higher compared to CT for image quality and confidence in contouring, particularly T<sub>2</sub>*W. This was also reflected in the shorter time for contouring, measuring 15.4, 9.6 and 9.8 min for CT, T<sub>2</sub>W and T<sub>2</sub>*W MRI respectively. Conclusion: Therapeutic radiographer prostate contours are more accurate, show less interobserver variability and are more confidently and quickly outlined on MRI compared to CT, particularly using T<sub>2</sub>*W MRI. Advances in knowledge: Our work is relevant for MRI sequence choice and development of the roles of the interprofessional team in the advancement of MRI-guided radiotherapy.

References

YearCitations

Page 1