Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem · 2019 · 26 citations · 24 references
Public HealthChild HealthPediatricsComparative Effectiveness ResearchEpidemiologyNeonatologyNewborn CareUmbilical Cord CareUmbilical Cord ComplicationsChlorhexidine Cord CareChlorhexidine TreatmentChlorhexidine-based Infection PreventionComparative Clinical TrialsDry Cord CareInfant Mortality AnalysisInfant Mortality ReductionMethodological Quality Assessment
ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effect of dry care and the application of chlorhexidine to the umbilical cord of newborns at risk of developing omphalitis. Method: systematic review with meta-analysis. Clinical trials comparing dry care with the application of clorexidine to evaluate omphalitis were selected. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. Results: the joint analysis of the studies shows a significant decrease in the risk of omphalitis in the chlorhexidine group compared to the dry care group (RR=0.58, CI: 0.53-0.64). However, in the analysis by subgroups, chlorhexidine umbilical cord care did not reduce the risk of omphalitis in hospital births (RR=0.82, CI: 0.64-1.05), in countries with a low infant mortality rate (RR=0.8, CI: 0.5-1.28), or at chlorhexidine concentrations below 4% (RR=0.55, CI: 0.31-1). Chlorhexidine acted as a protective factor at a concentration of 4% (RR=0.58, CI: 0.53-0.64), when applied in cases of home births (RR=0.57, CI: 0.51-0.62), in countries with a high infant mortality rate (RR=0.57, CI: 0.52-0.63). Conclusion: dry cord care is effective in countries with low infant mortality rate and in hospital births. However, 4% chlorhexidine for umbilical cord care protects against omphalitis in home births, in countries with a high infant mortality rate.
24
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
David Moher, A. Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al. · BMJ · 2009 · 83.3K citations · Full text
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider et al. · BMJ · 1997 · 56.3K citations
Luke C. Mullany, Gary L. Darmstadt, Subarna K. Khatry et al. · The Lancet · 2006 · 314 citations