Intraperitoneal α-Emitting Radioimmunotherapy with<sup>211</sup>At in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up with Individual Absorbed Dose Estimations

Andreas Hallqvist, Karin Bergmark, Tom Bäck, Håkan Andersson, Pernilla Dahm‐Kähler, Mia Johansson, Sture Lindegren, Holger Jensen, Lars Jacobsson, Ragnar Hultborn,

Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2019 · 73 citations · 17 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

Eliminating microscopic residual disease with α-particle radiation is theoretically appealing. After extensive preclinical work with α-particle–emitting <sup>211</sup>At, we performed a phase I trial with intraperitoneal α-particle therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer using <sup>211</sup>At conjugated to MX35, the antigen-binding fragments—F(ab′)<sub>2</sub>—of a mouse monoclonal antibody. We now present clinical outcome data and toxicity in a long-term follow-up with individual absorbed dose estimations. <b>Methods:</b> Twelve patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer, achieving a second complete or nearly complete response with chemotherapy, received intraperitoneal treatment with escalating (20–215 MBq/L) activity concentrations of <sup>211</sup>At-MX35 F(ab′)<sub>2.</sub><b>Results:</b> The activity concentration was escalated to 215 MBq/L without any dose-limiting toxicities. Most toxicities were low-grade and likely related to the treatment procedure, not clearly linked to the α-particle irradiation, with no observed hematologic toxicity. One grade 3 fatigue and 1 grade 4 intestinal perforation during catheter implantation were observed. Four patients had a survival of more than 6 y, one of whom did not relapse. At progression, chemotherapy was given without signs of reduced tolerability. Overall median survival was 35 mo, with a 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-y survival of 100%, 83%, 50%, and 25%, respectively. Calculations of the absorbed doses showed that a lower specific activity is associated with a lower single-cell dose, whereas a high specific activity may result in a lower central dose in microtumors. Individual differences in absorbed dose to possible microtumors were due to variations in administered activity and the specific activity. <b>Conclusion</b>: No apparent signs of radiation-induced toxicity or decreased tolerance to relapse therapy were observed. The dosimetric calculations show that further optimization is advisable to increase the efficacy and reduce possible long-term toxicity.

References

17