British Journal of Pharmacology · 2018 · 26 citations · 28 references
MedicineNuclear MedicinePharmacologyMolecular ImagingMolecular PharmacologyNeuropharmacologyCannabinoid PharmacologyPositron Emission TomographyReceptor ImagingCannabinoid AgonistsCannabinoid Receptor PharmacologyIn Vivo ImagingPet TracersRadiochemical Purity AssessmentRadiochemical Purity SpecificationsRadiochemical Purity Testing
Background and Purpose Non‐invasive in vivo imaging of cannabinoid CB 2 receptors using PET is pursued to study neuroinflammation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the in vivo binding specificity of [ 18 F]MA3, a CB 2 receptor agonist, in a rat model with local overexpression of human ( h ) CB 2 receptors. Methods [ 18 F]MA3 was produced with good radiochemical yield and radiochemical purity. The radiotracer was evaluated in rats with local overexpression of h CB 2 receptors and in a healthy non‐human primate using PET. Key Results Ex vivo autoradiography demonstrated CB 2 ‐specific binding of [ 18 F]MA3 in rat h CB 2 receptor vector injected striatum. In a PET study, increased tracer binding in the h CB 2 receptor vector‐injected striatum compared to the contralateral control vector‐injected striatum was observed. Binding in h CB 2 receptor vector‐injected striatum was blocked with a structurally non‐related CB 2 receptor inverse agonist, and a displacement study confirmed the reversibility of tracer binding. This study identified the utility of mutated inactive vector model for evaluation of CB 2 receptor agonist PET tracers. [ 18 F]MA3 PET scans in the non‐human primate showed good uptake and fast washout from brain, but no CB 2 receptor‐specific binding was observed. Conclusion and Implications Evaluation of [ 18 F]MA3 in a rat model with local overexpression of h CB 2 receptors showed CB 2 receptor‐specific and reversible tracer binding. [ 18 F]MA3 showed good brain uptake and subsequent washout in a healthy non‐human primate, but no specific binding was observed. Further clinical evaluation of [ 18 F]MA3 in patients with neuroinflammation is warranted. Linked Articles This article is part of a themed section on 8 th European Workshop on Cannabinoid Research. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.10/issuetoc
28