The Journal of Economic Perspectives · 2019 · 568 citations · 69 references
Environmental LawEnvironmental CrimeSocial SciencesEnvironmental PolicyGrassroots MovementAfrican American StudiesEnvironmental Justice LiteraturePublic PolicyUrban PolicyEconomicsSpatial RelationshipsEnvironmental PoliticsEnvironmental JusticeSociologyUrban EconomicsBusinessSocio-environmental ImplicationUrban Social JusticePollution
The 1980s grassroots movement brought environmental justice to the national stage, and subsequent research has shown a persistent correlation between pollution exposure, race, and poverty, establishing inequitable exposure as a stylized fact of social science. The paper reviews environmental justice literature, focusing on its intersection with economic research. The authors examine evidence of disproportionate exposure, analyze how spatial modeling and conditioning affect results, evaluate four mechanisms—disproportionate siting, household migration to nuisances, market coordination, and discriminatory politics—and outline potential policy responses. The study concludes that additional research is required to determine the relative importance of each proposed mechanism.
The grassroots movement that placed environmental justice issues on the national stage around 1980 was soon followed up by research documenting the correlation between pollution and race and poverty. This work has established inequitable exposure to nuisances as a stylized fact of social science. In this paper, we review the environmental justice literature, especially where it intersects with work by economists. First we consider the literature documenting evidence of disproportionate exposure. We particularly consider the implications of modeling choices about spatial relationships between polluters and residents, and about conditioning variables. Next, we evaluate the theory and evidence for four possible mechanisms that may lie behind the patterns seen: disproportionate siting on the firm side, “coming to the nuisance” on the household side, market-like coordination of the two, and discriminatory politics and/or enforcement. We argue that further research is needed to understand how much weight to give each mechanism. Finally, we discuss some policy options.
69
A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures
Charles M. Tiebout · Journal of Political Economy · 1956 · 13K citations
AEA Papers and Proceedings · 2019 · 11K citations
International Economics, Economic Inquiry, Several Coeditors +20
The Economics of Discrimination.
David Collard, Gary S. Becker · The Economic Journal · 1972 · 3.7K citations
Killing Me Softly: The Fetal Origins Hypothesis
Douglas Almond, Janet Currie · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · 2011 · 1.6K citations · Full text