Concepedia

TLDR

A digital revolution in agriculture, driven by sensors, AI, and robotics, promises greater efficiency but raises social questions about its impact on diverse labourers and rural communities. The paper outlines key trends at the intersection of agriculture, technology, and labour in North America, especially Canada, and uses a social justice lens to examine how digital technologies may exacerbate racial exploitation of farm labour and marginalize rural communities. The authors analyze literature and field data to identify trends in agricultural production, technology, and labour. The study identifies three tensions—rising land costs and automation, a high‑skill/low‑skill labour split, and digital data control—and argues that policy and research must redirect digitalization to support food production and marginalized labourers, warning that enthusiasm for digital agriculture risks intensifying exploitation and spatial marginalization.

Abstract

A “digital revolution” in agriculture is underway. Advanced technologies like sensors, artificial intelligence, and robotics are increasingly being promoted as a means to increase food production efficiency while minimizing resource use. In the process, agricultural digitalization raises critical social questions about the implications for diverse agricultural labourers and rural spaces as digitalization evolves. In this paper, we use literature and field data to outline some key trends being observed at the nexus of agricultural production, technology, and labour in North America, with a particular focus on the Canadian context. Using the data, we highlight three key tensions observed: rising land costs and automation; the development of a high-skill/low-skilled bifurcated labour market; and issues around the control of digital data. With these tensions in mind, we use a social justice lens to consider the potential implications of digital agricultural technologies for farm labour and rural communities, which directs our attention to racial exploitation in agricultural labour specifically. In exploring these tensions, we argue that policy and research must further examine how to shift the trajectory of digitalization in ways that support food production as well as marginalized agricultural labourers, while pointing to key areas for future research—which is lacking to date. We emphasize that the current enthusiasm for digital agriculture should not blind us to the specific ways that new technologies intensify exploitation and deepen both labour and spatial marginalization.

References

YearCitations

Page 1