The Journal Agriculture and Forestry · 2018 · 18 citations · 16 references
AgricultureEarth SciencesSoil SciencesSoil ChemistrySoil MechanicsSoil SciencePorosity AnalysisSoil PorosityPerlite SubstratesSubstrate Water RetentionWater Retention CapacityWater Retention MediaWater Retention Performance
The results of the water retention curves between (pF -2 and -4.2) matric potential for two substrates perlite and peat, are presented in this paper. Perlite is an inorganic, expanded aluminosilicate of volcanic origin. Peat is an organic substrate. For assessing this parameter, the method of bar extractors and Porous plate extractors have been explored. The method is applied on 7 different regimes of pressure (0.1; 0.33; 1; 3; 6.25; 11; 15 bars) in samples composed of perlite and peat present at different volume ratios of 80% Perlite + 20% Peat, 70%Perlite + 30% Peat, 50% Perlite + 50% Peat, 30% Perlite + 70% Peat, 20%Perlite + 80% Peat. The retention capacity of the prlite, at all applied different point of tension, is: 67.88% for 0.1 bar, 58.35%, for 0.33 bar, 47.70% for 1 bar, 39.78%; for 3 bars, 34.84 for 6.25 bars, 30.10% for 11 bars and 26.65% for 15 bars and for the peat are: for 0.1 bar = 89.16%, for 0.33 bar = 74.84%, for 1 bar = 57.94%; for 3 bars = 45.15%; for 6.25 bars = 39.57; for 11 bars = 33.89%; for 15 bars = 23.17%. The peat substrate shows higher retention at all points of tension of 0.1; 0.33; 1; 3; 6.25; 11, with the exception of 15 bars, when the retention is lower than the substrate perlite.
16
Physical Properties of Various Coconut Coir Dusts Compared to Peat
M. Abad, F. Fornés, C. Carrión et al. · HortScience · 2005 · 196 citations · Full text
Healthy Substrates Need Physicals Too!
T.E. Bilderback, Stuart L. Warren, James S. Owen et al. · HortTechnology · 2005 · 158 citations · Full text
Agriculture, Agronomy, Crop Sciences +15
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE*
George C. Martin · Acta Horticulturae · 1991 · 96 citations