Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learning

Heinrich Jiang, Ofir Nachum

arXiv (Cornell University) · 2019 · 116 citations · 32 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Datasets often contain biases that unfairly disadvantage certain groups, and classifiers trained on such data can inherit these biases. This paper provides a mathematical formulation of how such bias can arise. The authors assume hidden unbiased labels overwritten by a biased annotator and propose a fast, robust re‑weighting procedure that can be applied to any learning algorithm. The re‑weighting scheme corrects bias, is theoretically equivalent to training on unbiased labels, and empirically outperforms standard fairness methods on benchmark datasets.

Abstract

Datasets often contain biases which unfairly disadvantage certain groups, and classifiers trained on such datasets can inherit these biases. In this paper, we provide a mathematical formulation of how this bias can arise. We do so by assuming the existence of underlying, unknown, and unbiased labels which are overwritten by an agent who intends to provide accurate labels but may have biases against certain groups. Despite the fact that we only observe the biased labels, we are able to show that the bias may nevertheless be corrected by re-weighting the data points without changing the labels. We show, with theoretical guarantees, that training on the re-weighted dataset corresponds to training on the unobserved but unbiased labels, thus leading to an unbiased machine learning classifier. Our procedure is fast and robust and can be used with virtually any learning algorithm. We evaluate on a number of standard machine learning fairness datasets and a variety of fairness notions, finding that our method outperforms standard approaches in achieving fair classification.

References

32