IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · 2018 · 108 citations · 65 references
Life SciencesBioinformaticsMolecular BiologyComputational BiologyNetwork BiologyProtein-protein InteractionsMolecular Interaction NetworksNetwork CentralityProtein-protein Interaction AnalysisProtein-protein Interaction NetworksBetweenness CentralityCentralityComputational Prediction ModelsInformation CentralityNeighborhood CentralityProtein Interaction Network TopologySubgraph CentralityTopological Features
Identifying essential proteins plays an important role in disease study, drug design, and understanding the minimal requirement for cellular life. Computational methods for essential proteins discovery overcome the disadvantages of biological experimental methods that are often time-consuming, expensive, and inefficient. The topological features of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are often used to design computational prediction methods, such as Degree Centrality (DC), Betweenness Centrality (BC), Closeness Centrality (CC), Subgraph Centrality (SC), Eigenvector Centrality (EC), Information Centrality (IC), and Neighborhood Centrality (NC). However, the prediction accuracies of these individual methods still have space to be improved. Studies show that additional information, such as orthologous relations, helps discover essential proteins. Many researchers have proposed different methods by combining multiple information sources to gain improvement of prediction accuracy. In this study, we find that essential proteins appear in triangular structure in PPI network significantly more often than nonessential ones. Based on this phenomenon, we propose a novel pure centrality measure, so-called Neighborhood Closeness Centrality (NCC). Accordingly, we develop a new combination model, Extended Pareto Optimality Consensus model, named EPOC, to fuse NCC and Orthology information and a novel essential proteins identification method, NCCO, is fully proposed. Compared with seven existing classic centrality methods (DC, BC, IC, CC, SC, EC, and NC) and three consensus methods (PeC, ION, and CSC), our results on S.cerevisiae and E.coli datasets show that NCCO has clear advantages. As a consensus method, EPOC also yields better performance than the random walk model.
65
Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome
Guri Giaever, Angela Chu, Li Ni et al. · Nature · 2002 · 4.5K citations
CytoNCA: A cytoscape plugin for centrality analysis and evaluation of protein interaction networks
Yu Tang, Min Li, Jianxin Wang et al. · Biosystems · 2014 · 1.3K citations