Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine · 2018 · 32 citations · 46 references
MedicineAnesthesiologyNeurosurgeryAnesthesiaAnesthetic TechniquesBiosensorsCerebral Perfusion MonitoringIntracranial PressureIntracranial Pressure ManagementIntracranial Pressure MonitoringIntraoperative MonitoringPressure SensorsCerebrospinal Fluid Pressure MeasurementContinuous Intracranial Pressure MonitoringHead Position Effects On Intracranial PressureIntracranial BiosensorsIntracranial Pressure Monitoring DevicesInvasive Brain MonitoringNoninvasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
BACKGROUND: Monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) is a critical component in the management of intracranial hypertension. Safety, efficacy, and optimal location of microsensor devices have not been defined in dogs. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE: Assessment of ICP using a microsensor transducer is feasible in anesthetized and conscious animals and is independent of transducer location. Intraparenchymal transducer placement is associated with more adverse effects. ANIMALS: Seven adult, bred-for-research dogs. METHODS: In a prospective investigational study, microsensor ICP transducers were inserted into subdural and intraparenchymal locations at defined rostral or caudal locations within the rostrotentorial compartment under general anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure and ICP were measured continuously during physiological maneuvers, and for 20 hours after anesthesia. RESULTS: Baseline mean ± SD values for ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure were 7.2 ± 2.3 and 78.9 ± 7.6 mm Hg, respectively. Catheter position did not have a significant effect on ICP measurements. There was significant variation from baseline ICP accompanying physiological maneuvers (P < .001) and with normal activities, especially with changes in head position (P < .001). Pathological sequelae were more evident after intraparenchymal versus subdural placement. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Use of a microsensor ICP transducer was technically straightforward and provided ICP measurements within previously reported reference ranges. Results support the use of an accessible dorsal location and subdural positioning. Transient fluctuations in ICP are normal events in conscious dogs and large variations associated with head position should be accounted for when evaluating animals with intracranial hypertension.
46
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using <b>lme4</b>
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker et al. · Journal of Statistical Software · 2015 · 85.6K citations · Full text
Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition
Nancy Carney, Annette M Totten, Cindy O’Reilly et al. · Neurosurgery · 2016 · 4.3K citations
VI. Indications for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
Susan L. Bratton, Randall M. Chestnut, Jamshid Ghajar et al. · Journal of Neurotrauma · 2007 · 401 citations
VII. Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Technology
Susan L. Bratton, Randall M. Chestnut, Jamshid Ghajar et al. · Journal of Neurotrauma · 2007 · 213 citations
Complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with head trauma
Richard C. E. Anderson, Peter Kan, Paul Klimo et al. · Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics · 2004 · 148 citations
Medicine, Pediatrics, Surgery +16