Treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization in patients with<i>FLT3</i>‐mutated and wild‐type acute myeloid leukemia: A medical chart study

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To assess real‐world treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among patients with FLT3 –mutated ( FLT3 mut ) and FLT3 –wild‐type ( FLT3 wt ) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods Data were abstracted from medical charts of patients with AML from 10 countries. Patients were grouped based on their FLT3 mutation status, age (18‐64 or ≥65), and whether they were newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (R/R). Results Charts of 1027 AML patients were included (183 FLT3 mut 18‐64 ND; 136 FLT3 mut ≥65 ND; 181 FLT3 mut R/R; 186 FLT3 wt 18‐64 ND; 159 FLT3 wt ≥65 ND; 182 FLT3 wt R/R). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in treatment patterns for AML. Among ND patients 18‐64, the most common initial treatment was standard‐to‐intermediate dose cytarabine‐based therapies (43.2% for FLT3 mut and 55.9% for FLT3 wt ); among ND patients ≥65, the most common initial treatment was hypomethylating agent‐based therapies (36.0% and 47.2%). Among R/R patients, the most common initial treatment after R/R was best supportive care only (39.8% and 24.7%). HRU was substantial across cohorts during both event‐free and post‐event periods. Conclusions Treatment patterns of AML were heterogeneous and FLT3 mut AML was treated more aggressively than FLT3 wt disease. HRU was substantial for all cohorts, particularly after relapse or treatment failure.